Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
New Legal Developments Surrounding UN Agency and Hamas Terror Attacks
The Trump Justice Department has made a significant legal move by asserting that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine, known as UNRWA, can be held liable in U.S. courts for its alleged role in the October 7, 2023 attacks carried out by Hamas in Israel. This tragic event resulted in the deaths of nearly 1,200 individuals, including over 30 Americans.
Justice Department’s Position on UNRWA
On Thursday, the Justice Department submitted a document to federal court in New York, explicitly stating that UNRWA does not enjoy immunity, thus potentially paving the way for a substantial lawsuit. Families representing over 100 victims of the Hamas-led assault are seeking $1 billion in damages, claiming that the UN agency provided critical support to the terror group, which facilitated the horrific attacks.
Details of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit, initially filed in June in the Southern District of New York, alleges that UNRWA played a role in bolstering Hamas’s infrastructure and operational capacity. Plaintiffs contend that the agency knowingly supplied Hamas with U.S. currency that was essential for procuring weapons, explosives, and other materials needed for the attacks.
According to court filings, over $1 billion from UNRWA’s bank account in New York allegedly benefited Hamas, a group designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. The lawsuit further accuses UNRWA of permitting the construction of tunnels and operational centers beneath its facilities, thus facilitating the terror group’s activities.
Key Figures and Legal Implications
Philippe Lazzarini, the head of UNRWA, faces inclusion as a defendant in the proceedings, which adds another layer of complexity to the case. The Justice Department clarified that, under current law, UNRWA is not classified as part of the core United Nations structure. Instead, it is viewed more like a specialized agency not fully protected under international treaties.
The implications of this determination are significant, as it means that UNRWA lacks the diplomatic immunity typically afforded to United Nations entities. Consequently, the agency will be compelled to respond to the allegations raised in the lawsuit.
Allegations of Atrocious Conduct
The Justice Department document outlined the severity of the allegations, stating that they paint a picture of unspeakable actions taken by UNRWA and its officials. This legal perspective stands in stark contrast to the previous Biden administration’s position, which maintained that UNRWA was protected by international legal immunity.
The recent shift in policy highlights the contentious nature of the discussion surrounding UNRWA and its operations, particularly in the wake of the devastating October attacks.
Legislative Context and Reactions
Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, recently introduced legislation aimed at allowing American victims of terrorist organizations to pursue legal action against entities that fund these groups. This proposed law specifically seeks to strip UNRWA of its immunity, enabling American victims of terrorism, including those affected by the October 7 attacks, to hold the agency accountable in U.S. courts.
This legislation effectively reintroduces the Limiting Immunity for Assisting Backers of Lethal Extremism Act, colloquially known as the LIABLE Act. While the Justice Department’s new stance partially fulfills the core intention behind the bill, the proposed legislation aims to cement these no-immunity principles into U.S. law permanently.
US Aid and UNRWA’s Future
Following allegations concerning the involvement of UNRWA employees in the October attacks, the U.S. took the step of suspending aid to the agency. Prior to this suspension, the United States served as UNRWA’s largest single donor, making the implications of reduced funding particularly impactful.
The ongoing legal proceedings, coupled with potential changes in U.S. policy regarding aid and international accountability, may significantly affect UNRWA’s operations moving forward.
Looking Ahead: The Path of Justice
The developments in this case underscore a critical juncture for accountability in international institutions and their role in conflict zones. As the families of the victims of the October 7 attacks seek justice, their journey is not just a matter of legal proceedings; it has the potential to reshape the landscape of international law regarding immunity.
The road ahead remains arduous. Plaintiffs will need to establish the veracity of their claims in court, navigating through complex legal frameworks and international law. However, this shift in the Justice Department’s position signals a willingness to reassess accountability standards for international entities like UNRWA, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing fight against terrorism and its enablers.
The implications of this case extend far beyond the courtroom, highlighting the need for vigilance in ensuring that humanitarian organizations do not unwittingly support terror groups. The outcomes may redefine the responsibilities and accountability of international agencies, reshaping policies and practices that could have lasting effects on global security.
