Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In a surprising decision, President Donald Trump announced on Monday that the adult children of former President Joe Biden, specifically Hunter and Ashley Biden, will no longer receive protection from the U.S. Secret Service.
Trump shared this announcement through a post on Truth Social, where he emphasized that Hunter Biden has enjoyed an extended period of Secret Service protection. He criticized the scale of the security detail, stating, “There are as many as 18 people on this Detail, which is ridiculous!” He declared, “Please be advised that, effective immediately, Hunter Biden will no longer receive Secret Service protection.”
Additionally, Trump confirmed that Ashley Biden, Hunter’s sister, will also have her Secret Service protection revoked. He highlighted that 13 agents had been assigned to her security detail.
In response to Trump’s decision, the Secret Service released a statement. The agency acknowledged awareness of the changes regarding protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden, stating, “The Secret Service will comply and is actively working with the protective details and the White House to ensure compliance as soon as possible.” This reflects the agency’s commitment to adapt to the new directives issued by the President.
Legal representatives for Hunter Biden have been contacted by Fox News Digital regarding this development. The implications of revoking such protection could resonate beyond personal safety, drawing attention to the broader political landscape.
Under federal law, former presidents and their spouses receive lifetime Secret Service protection. However, the protection for immediate family members over the age of 16 typically ceases when they leave office. Notably, both Trump and Biden had previously granted extensions for their children’s protection for an additional six months upon their exit from the White House, according to reports from the Associated Press.
In a contrast to Trump’s decision, former President Biden allowed Baron Trump, the youngest son of Donald Trump, to maintain his Secret Service protection after turning 16. This difference highlights the variations in how protection protocols can be applied within political families.
Trump’s remarks came at a time when Joe Biden was reported to be vacationing in South Africa. This country has recently faced scrutiny from the U.S. administration for its controversial land exploration law, which permits the government to seize land without compensation. Such actions have drawn criticism for discriminating against white landowners and have led to tensions in diplomatic relations.
In his post, Trump remarked, “Because of this, South Africa has been taken off our list of countries receiving Economic and Financial Assistance,” indicating a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy towards the nation.
Adding to this political discourse, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared last week that South Africa’s ambassador to the United States is “no longer welcome” in the country. This comment followed a Friday webinar where South African diplomat Ebrahim Rasool addressed the Trump administration’s policies on diversity and equity and its implications on immigration.
During the webinar, Rasool criticized what he described as the “supremacist assault on incumbency.” He linked it to the domestic politics in the U.S. and the rise of the Make America Great Again movement. Rasool remarked on the demographic shifts in the United States, suggesting that the voting electorate is projected to become increasingly diverse, with whites making up only 48%.
In response, Rubio accused Ebrahim Rasool of race-baiting and suggested that the South African diplomat harbored animosity toward Trump. He further reinforced his stance by labeling Rasool as “persona non grata” in a post on social media.
The revocation of Secret Service protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden may hold significant implications for their personal lives and public perception. This decision could set a precedent for how political families are treated regarding security measures. As the political landscape shifts, the ramifications of such changes will likely be felt throughout various sectors, from security to public opinion.
Moreover, the relationship between the United States and countries like South Africa may continue to evolve as diplomatic tensions rise over controversial policies and actions taken by foreign governments. The blend of domestic and international politics creates a complex web of interactions that could influence future policy decisions and electoral outcomes.
As the Trump administration continues to make headlines with its policies and announcements, questions surrounding the safety and security of political figures and their families will remain relevant. Observers will be watching closely to see how this decision impacts not only the Biden family but also the broader implications for political families navigating security challenges.
Ultimately, the interplay of security, politics, and international relations continues to shape the narrative of American governance in a rapidly changing world. The future will reveal whether Trump’s actions set a new standard for how political families are treated in terms of security or whether this decision becomes an isolated case in the saga of U.S. politics.