Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In a striking statement, President Donald Trump suggested that individuals convicted of setting fire to Tesla properties should serve their lengthy sentences in prisons located in El Salvador. This provocative idea emerged on Trump’s social media platform TRUTH Social, invoking a range of reactions.
On Friday, Trump expressed his disdain for the perpetrators, referring to them as ‘sick terrorist thugs’ and arguing that they deserve significant jail time for their actions against Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk. His statement emphasized a stern approach towards the increasing incidents of vandalism and violence directly linked to prominent national protests.
Trump’s remarks regarding El Salvador prisons come amidst rising interest in the country’s criminal justice system, particularly under the leadership of President Nayib Bukele. Known for his strict measures against crime, Bukele has publicly showcased his government’s hardline stance, which includes the controversial detention of alleged gang members.
“Perhaps they could serve them in the prisons of El Salvador, which have become so recently famous for such lovely conditions!” Trump noted, referring to reports of harsh environments within these facilities.
The president’s comments follow a concerning surge in attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities across the United States. The FBI has initiated investigations into what some are labeling as domestic terrorism, as incidents of vandalism and arson against Tesla properties have gained momentum.
Simultaneously, the Trump administration faces legal challenges about deportation flights to El Salvador. Recently, videos surfaced showing Salvadoran troops escorting members of the Venezuelan criminal organization, Tren de Aragua, into a confinement center, which underscores El Salvador’s approach to handling national security threats.
On Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi unveiled charges against three suspects linked to the use of Molotov cocktails to ignite fires at Tesla locations. Bondi’s declaration underscored the administration’s commitment to addressing the wave of violence directed at the electric vehicle manufacturer.
“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” Bondi stated firmly. She went on to warn potential offenders that the Department of Justice would pursue justice vigorously against those engaged in what it characterized as domestic terrorism.
The Justice Department has detailed a series of alarming incidents involving individuals setting Tesla cars ablaze. In one case, a defendant carried a suppressed AR-15 rifle while allegedly attacking a dealership in Salem, Oregon. Another suspect was apprehended in Loveland, Colorado, after attempting to light Teslas on fire.
In Charleston, South Carolina, another individual reportedly scrawled derogatory messages about Trump at charging stations before launching incendiary attacks against those stations. These incidents reflect an alarming trend of violence against Tesla properties.
The issue extends beyond isolated incidents. Across at least nine states, Tesla dealerships and vehicles have faced arson, gunfire, and vandalism. In cities known for their liberal leanings, such as Portland and Seattle, the attacks have particularly intensified.
An alarming charge was filed against a man in Oregon after he allegedly hurled Molotov cocktails at a Tesla in Salem, only to return later and shoot out windows. This event echoed in nearby Tigard, where a Tesla showroom endured a barrage of bullets, further showcasing the rising violence against the brand.
Incidents in Seattle are particularly concerning. Four Cybertrucks were set on fire in a Tesla lot earlier this month, and reports surfaced of an individual igniting a Model S on a city street, further indicating a coordinated effort against the electric vehicle manufacturer.
Similarly, in Las Vegas, multiple Tesla cars were engulfed in flames outside a service center, accompanied by the words “resist” spray-painted across the building’s front. Authorities connected the acts of arson to groups exhibiting anti-capitalist sentiments.
The troubling question arises: is this a case of terrorism? Spencer Evans, the special agent in charge of the FBI office in Las Vegas, commented on the motivations behind these violent acts, suggesting they exhibit characteristics common to politically motivated violence.
“Was this terrorism? Was it something else? It certainly has some of the hallmarks that we might think – the writing on the wall, potential political agenda, an act of violence,” Evans articulated during a recent press briefing, echoing concerns prevalent among law enforcement officials.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.