Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The Trump administration has affirmed that the United States Institute of Peace is on a positive trajectory following a federal court ruling that supported the administration’s position in a recent standoff with the Department of Government Efficiency. This decision marks a significant legal victory for the administration and clarifies the authority of the president over board appointments.
According to a statement from a Trump administration official, the U.S. District Court’s ruling reaffirms the president’s clear judicial power to appoint and remove members of the board. The ruling emphasizes that the United States Institute of Peace, or USIP, must adhere to the directives set forth by the executive office, indicating a strong commitment to accountability and effective governance.
Legal Proceedings and the Standoff
District Judge Beryl Howell ruled on Wednesday against a request made by USIP for a temporary restraining order. The order sought to halt what they characterized as an unlawful takeover by the DOGE team at the institute’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.
In their lawsuit, USIP officials claimed that the court needed to intervene immediately to prevent the alleged dismantling of their operations, which they argued would severely impact their ability to fulfill their legal mandates for peace promotion and conflict resolution.
Background of the Institute of Peace
The United States Institute of Peace is an independent institution established by Congress in 1984 during the Reagan administration. Its mission focuses on promoting peace and diplomacy internationally. Recent actions by the Trump administration led to the dismissal of 11 out of 14 board members due to noncompliance with an executive order issued in February. This order mandated a reduction in the institute’s size to align with legal requirements.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly stated that after USIP did not comply with the executive directive, the administration lawfully removed 11 board members, appointing Kenneth Jackson as the acting president. Notable remaining board members include Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
Incident at the Institute’s Headquarters
Over the weekend, Kenneth Jackson and a DOGE team attempted to access the USIP headquarters but were met with resistance from the institute’s staff. Reports from administration sources suggest that tensions escalated, leading to a confrontation as Jackson accused the staff of barring their entry.
On Monday, Jackson and his team attempted to reenter the building, which led to the involvement of the Metropolitan Police Department. The MPD reported a call from the United States Attorney’s Office around 4 PM concerning the unfolding situation at the institute.
According to the police’s account, they met with Jackson, who presented documentation proving his position as acting president of USIP. He communicated that unauthorized individuals remained inside the building, refusing to vacate the premises.
Police Intervention and Resolution
The intervention by police allowed Jackson to gain access to the facility. Meanwhile, former acting president George Moose exited without incident, and no arrests were made during the encounter.
With Jackson now legally serving as the acting president, the Trump administration expressed confidence that USIP would comply with the guidelines established in the president’s February executive order.
Resistance from Bureaucrats
In a press briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt described how staff members at USIP physically barricaded themselves inside the building to resist the oversight of political appointees working under the direction of the president. This significant obstruction involved barricading doors and disabling communication systems, coupled with internal memos that encouraged resistance among employees.
Leavitt pointed out that this behavior is indicative of a broader issue where bureaucrats resist changes initiated by the current administration, which had been elected to implement reform. The behaviors displayed by USIP staff were framed as inappropriate and antithetical to the principles of governmental accountability.
Comparative Cases of Bureaucratic Resistance
This incident at USIP parallels a recent standoff involving the U.S. African Development Foundation, where DOGE encountered similar obstacles while trying to gain access to the office. In that situation, officials from the foundation prevented the acting head of the U.S. Agency for International Development from entering the building. The president of the foundation, who was later dismissed by the administration, filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the administration from removing him from office. However, a federal judge denied his request.
Looking Forward: The Future of USIP
The series of events surrounding USIP highlights significant tensions within the Trump administration as it seeks to enforce its directives. The administration’s recent legal victories signal an intention to consolidate control over operations within federally funded agencies and promote a leadership structure aligned with its objectives.
As the U.S. Institute of Peace resumes regular operations, the focus will likely turn to how effectively it can carry out its mandate amidst these complex dynamics. Given the current political climate, stakeholders across various sectors will undoubtedly be monitoring developments at USIP closely, as these events may foreshadow similar confrontations in the future.
