Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
University of Minnesota students have expressed their outrage over the university leadership’s perceived weak stance on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement regulations, calling for the campus to be declared a sanctuary site for immigrants.
During a rally held on campus on Thursday, protesters voiced their demands passionately. The lead speaker posed a question to the assembly, asking, “What do we want?” The crowd responded with resounding calls for a sanctuary campus. When asked what should happen if their demands were not met, their chant echoed back, “Shut it down!”
The demonstration was organized by the progressive group Students for a Democratic Society. Despite the freezing temperatures, students, faculty, and residents from Minneapolis gathered at Coffman Student Union to protest against the university’s compliance with ICE policies.
Many participants carried signs with messages such as “no human is illegal” and “Students Against the Racist Reactionary Republican Agenda,” showcasing their discontent with the current immigration scenario.
Recent changes in federal policy have stirred significant backlash among students and activists alike. President Donald Trump recently rescinded measures previously set in place to protect certain locations from ICE operations, including churches, hospitals, and educational institutions. This shift aligns with Trump’s enforcement agenda, which has been a focal point of heated debate.
The crowd also chanted, “Up, up with liberation. Down, down with deportation,” a call that resonates deeply in discussions surrounding immigration rights and social justice.
Sasmit Rahman, a senior studying psychology and member of Students for a Democratic Society, revealed the group’s ongoing mission. She stated, “Our campaign is rooted in response to Trump’s assault on academic freedoms, reproductive rights, and immigration rights.”
Rahman highlighted the irony of the university’s compliance with ICE. She pointed out the stark contrast between the university’s stance and a recent statement from Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frye, who declared Minneapolis a sanctuary city, firmly opposing ICE’s operations on the university’s campus.
The mayor’s strong message against collaborating with the Trump administration was welcomed by the students. They expressed approval of the mayor’s commitment to standing against deportation policies, signaling a divide between local governance and federal action.
A petition initiated by a coalition of students, faculty, and residents quickly gained traction, amassing over 3,000 signatures. The petition urged the university to resist current and future federal immigration enforcement efforts. Despite this overwhelming support, the University of Minnesota, as a federally funded institution, declared its obligation to comply with federal laws.
In a statement to the community, university officials acknowledged the tension surrounding immigration policies. While they emphasized their legal obligations, they also expressed a commitment to providing guidance and support to those impacted by these policies.
Reaction among students remains mixed. Many express deep frustration regarding the administration’s response to immigration laws. Melanie, a political science and Spanish major, shared her concerns, stating, “I think it’s ridiculous.” Her personal connection to the issue is strong, as both her parents are immigrants from Mexico.
Melanie underscored the plight of undocumented students striving for education, noting that many of their parents were unable to achieve a high school diploma.
Others voiced disappointment with the university’s decisions. Cedar, a sophomore on a pre-med track, remarked, “I think they are handling it a little roughly right now.”
On the other hand, Elizabeth, a sociology major, acknowledged the difficult position the university faces while sympathizing with students’ anxiety concerning immigration enforcement. She noted, “I hope they take a lenient approach, especially since many international students are present on campus.”
Students like Robert, an art and anthropology major, raised concerns about the university’s priorities. He stated, “I think it’s horrible that the university is doing what they are doing. They’re afraid and all they’re going for is the money.”
Despite the escalating pressure and activism from the student body, the University of Minnesota has refrained from commenting directly on the matter. The situation continues to unfold, showcasing the intersection of education, immigration policy, and community activism.
A Growing Movement on Campus
The University’s response to the protest underscores a growing divide between state-level policies and federal directives. Students are increasingly mobilizing, pressuring their institutions to uphold principles of sanctuary and support for all individuals, regardless of immigration status.
Building a Coalition for Change
As protests gain momentum, it appears clear that a coalition of students, faculty, and community members is committed to changing the rhetoric around immigration at the University of Minnesota. This movement reflects broader nationwide trends of activism regarding immigration issues, suggesting that the calls for sanctuary campuses may only grow louder.
Looking to the Future
The University of Minnesota’s stance and the subsequent student protests may signal a noteworthy shift in institutional policies regarding immigration enforcement. As the dialogue continues, students are determined to advocate for a campus environment that embraces inclusivity and defies oppressive policies, shaping a future that fosters equity and justice.
