Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
USAID’s Slide from Bipartisan Support: A Cautionary Tale
Critics often describe President Donald Trump’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) as a calamity. However, as someone who spent three years at USAID, I can assert that the agency’s fate was already predetermined.
An Overview of USAID’s Role
USAID serves as the U.S. government’s primary instrument for distributing tens of billions of taxpayer dollars in foreign aid. Unfortunately, this vital agency now faces challenges that stem from an ideological drift and a loss of bipartisan support in Congress, along with diminishing public trust.
Trump’s Critique of USAID
On his first day back in office, Trump issued an executive order halting many foreign aid initiatives, claiming that the U.S. foreign aid bureaucracy does not align with American interests. Within two weeks, he publicly chastised USAID for being “run by radical lunatics.”
The Shift in Management
In response to his concerns, Trump appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to integrate USAID into the State Department. Rubio quickly criticized USAID, accusing the agency of “rank insubordination.” This raises the question: how did USAID become a controversial entity?
The Origins of USAID
USAID was established in 1961 to counter Soviet efforts in the developing world, cultivate alliances, and respond to global crises such as natural disasters and epidemics. The agency adapted well to changing global contexts, but during the Clinton administration, it began to endorse progressive social agendas, including population control.
Evolution Under Recent Presidents
During Barack Obama’s presidency, USAID expanded its focus to include LGBT rights and climate change initiatives. Joe Biden intensified this trend, mandating that foreign aid programs address transgender issues, even in cases of providing food aid to refugees facing starvation.
Institutional Changes at USAID
Over time, USAID’s political culture became increasingly left-leaning, effectively purging conservative voices and failing to represent American values. It turned into a hub for progressive ideologies, often at odds with the needs of taxpayers.
Internal Conflicts Arise
In 2020, following the George Floyd protests, a significant portion of USAID staff called for the agency to express solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement while claiming systemic racism within its operations. More recently, another group of employees publicly challenged President Biden’s Israel policy, demanding a ceasefire with Hamas, which could have significant implications for regional security.
Continued Tensions with Congress
As the landscape changed and Congress sought greater accountability, USAID found itself at odds with those who fund its budget. In 2023, Senator Jodi Ernst pressed for clarity regarding taxpayer funding, revealing significant overhead in aid distributions. It was later found that nearly half of USAID’s funds were going towards administrative costs, raising questions about efficacy.
Funding Controversies
In a climate where many Americans struggle financially, accusations grew against USAID for frivolous expenditures, leading to increased scrutiny from legislators. Senator Jim Risch vowed to collaborate with Secretary Rubio to address these funding issues following troubling revelations about mismanagement within USAID.
A Growing Backlash
House committee chairman Brian Mast criticized USAID for its controversial spending practices, stating that taxpayer dollars funded initiatives many found objectionable. With calls to reform this agency reaching a fever pitch, the establishment faced a significant backlash.
Redefining the Future of USAID
As conservatives now hold power across major branches of government, the ideological shift may spell the end for USAID’s current operations. Advocates of reform are calling for a recalibrated focus on foreign aid that emphasizes efficiency, accountability, and alignment with U.S. interests.
Reimagining USAID’s Objectives
Secretary Rubio now faces the formidable task of distinguishing valuable aid programs from those that do not serve American interests. There is an opportunity to replace traditional aid implementers with local organizations that prioritize results without the burden of overhead.
Moving Toward Sustainable Aid
To truly alleviate poverty, the U.S. must pivot its foreign aid approach from endless funding to fostering trade and investment. This strategy has proven effective in the past and is essential for building sustainable economic futures globally.
A Road Ahead for USAID
Addressing the myriad issues within USAID is undoubtedly a complex and daunting challenge. However, it is a necessary step toward ensuring that foreign aid fulfills its intended purpose and reflects American values.
