Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Rachel Maddow has seen a significant decrease in her viewership following President Donald Trump’s victory on Election Day. This trend marks a troubling pattern, as this is not the first instance where a Trump victory has correlated with a notable dip in audience numbers for MSNBC’s leading host.
From the start of 2024 to Election Day, “The Rachel Maddow Show” attracted 2.3 million viewers. However, post-Trump’s victory, the show experienced a staggering 22% drop, averaging 1.8 million viewers between that moment and March 7.
The decline is even more pronounced within the crucial advertiser demographic of adults aged 25 to 54. In this key group, Maddow’s program has witnessed a 29% decrease. When comparing her audience immediately after Election Day to the total viewership leading up to Trump’s decisive win over Kamala Harris, the drop is striking.
Maddow has not only lost viewers since Election Day. Comparing her figures from the first two months of 2025 to the same period in 2024 reveals a drop of 24% among total viewers as well as the vital demographic, indicating that MSNBC’s audience is less engaged compared to the Biden administration’s tenure.
This pattern of audience disengagement is a familiar one. Following the Mueller Report’s release in April 2019, which concluded there was no collusion between Trump and Russia, Maddow’s viewership fell dramatically. In fact, she lost 22% of her total audience and 35% in the key demo in just four months after the report’s publication.
William Jacobson, a professor at Cornell Law School and a long-time media critic, noted that Maddow built her viewer base off of fervent anti-Trump sentiment. This sentiment promised a possible relief from suffering through seeing Trump defeated, a promise that is diminished when Trump secures victories.
According to Jacobson, it is not surprising that viewership would decline among an audience whose engagement relies heavily on opposing Trump. He remarked that when the president wins, the hope for a political shift diminishes.
Although Maddow’s audience dropped after the Mueller report, she bounced back following Trump’s inauguration. Statistics showed that from Election Day to Inauguration Day, her show averaged 1.4 million viewers and 105,000 in the advertiser-friendly demo. Once Trump assumed the presidency, her figures improved, averaging 1.9 million total viewers and 177,000 in the demo.
However, the landscape has changed once again. Joe Concha, a Fox News contributor, pointed out that Maddow has become increasingly predictable and less credible, a critical flaw in the competitive arena of cable news. He attributed this decline in credibility to the collapse of the Russia collusion narrative, which had served as a focal point for the show’s content during Trump’s first term.
In 2022, Maddow reduced her show’s frequency to once a week while pursuing other projects, despite her substantial salary. Nevertheless, she is currently filling the 9 p.m. ET timeslot during the early weeks of Trump’s second administration, a move that aligns with increased public interest.
Reports indicate that Maddow will return to hosting her program once a week in April. Her reported salary stands at $25 million a year. Although Concha critiques her effectiveness, he noted that she still draws better ratings than other MSNBC hosts.
With Maddow scaling back her show frequency, concerns over MSNBC’s viewership strategy are rising. Concha raised a provocative point, suggesting that if the network continues on its current trajectory, it may soon appear to have more employees than viewers.
MSNBC has yet to provide a comment regarding the shifts in Maddow’s audience figures. However, scrutiny of Maddow’s statements regarding layoffs at MSNBC reveals tension between her on-air personas and her corporate role. Critics have noted the incongruity in her complaints about management amidst layoffs, suggesting that her significant salary could have been utilized to save jobs.
Dylan Byers from Puck offered an eye-opening analysis, stating that Maddow’s annual pay equals the combined salaries of approximately 125 production staffers. This details a critical conversation about corporate responsibility and financial prioritization within the media landscape.
The shifting viewership trends for Maddow’s show represent challenges that extend beyond her personal ratings. They reflect broader dynamics within cable news as networks grapple with the impact of political developments on audience engagement. As MSNBC navigates these turbulent waters, the implications of viewer loyalty, performance trends, and the evolving political landscape will determine the network’s future direction.