Wall Street Journal Critiques Jake Tapper Over Biden’s Cognitive Decline Coverage

Wall Street Journal Critiques Jake Tapper Over Biden’s Cognitive Decline Coverage

The Wall Street Journal editorial board has called out CNN host Jake Tapper for previously dismissing a June 2024 article by the paper that detailed concerns about former President Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities. This critique arrives just as Tapper’s upcoming book on Biden’s mental decline is set to be released.

Background on the Controversy

The Wall Street Journal reported extensive observations on June 4, 2024, highlighting that many who interacted with Biden expressed worries about his mental condition. Tapper, however, quoted a dismissive White House response, including a remark implying that the Journal is biased due to its ownership by News Corp and the Murdoch family. He then proceeded to interview a Democrat who echoed this dismissal.

The editorial board noted, “A more curious journalist would have explored if it were true, and maybe even done some of his own reporting. Only now does he tacitly admit the Journal was right.” This suggests that they believe Tapper had a lapse in journalistic diligence.

Details of the Wall Street Journal Article

The Journal’s piece included interviews with 45 lawmakers and administration officials who verified their concerns about Biden’s mental acuity. Tapper, along with Axios reporter Alex Thompson, will publish their new book titled “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” on Tuesday, intensifying the discussion around Biden’s fitness for office.

The Media’s Role in the Biden Narrative

The Wall Street Journal editorial board found that a media cover-up surrounds Biden’s cognitive decline. They expressed that the mainstream media defends Biden against critiques regarding his mental capabilities. In their argument, they mentioned how the media serves as a protective shield whenever doubts arise about Biden’s fitness to serve.

In June 2024, just weeks before a pivotal debate showcasing Biden’s cognitive struggles, Tapper reacted to the Journal’s report, facing intense backlash from both Democrats and the liberal media. Tapper doubted the legitimacy of the report, claiming it was largely based on Republican observations. He featured a senior Biden aide, Senator Chris Coons from Delaware, on his show, who defended the president and sought to undermine the Journal’s reporting.

Defense of Tapper’s Reporting

In response to the editorial board’s claims, a CNN spokesperson firmly defended Tapper, asserting that he has always been a thorough journalist holding both parties accountable over his long career. The spokesperson highlighted Tapper’s consistent coverage of Biden’s political journey, from his campaign in 2020 to 2024, where he raised concerns about Biden’s capacity openly.

The representative noted, “Jake raised concerns about President Biden’s mental stamina on his shows, questioned Biden officials directly about his health on air, and consistently encouraged open discussion and debate on the issue.” This is an attempt to counteract allegations of bias in Tapper’s reporting.

Mixed Reactions from Political Parties

The Wall Street Journal editorial expanded its critique beyond Tapper, addressing the Democratic Party. Several leaders have now expressed regret over Biden’s decision to run for re-election, while others urge a focus on the future instead of past controversies.

The editors argued, “The coverup of Mr. Biden’s mental decline will go down as one of the great scandals of modern politics. By refusing to admit what voters could so clearly see, Democrats denied their party an open primary. Once Mr. Biden imploded, they handed Kamala Harris the nomination without debate.” This statement indicates the tensions within the party and critiques its handling of Biden’s presidential campaign.

Call for Reflection Within Media and Politics

The Journal concluded in its editorial that Democrats and the press should reflect on their roles in the current political landscape, particularly with the anxiety surrounding former President Donald Trump’s second term. The editors posited that it would benefit them to seek contrition for their past actions.

As discussions continue, Biden was recently diagnosed with what has been described as an aggressive form of prostate cancer. The diagnosis was publicly revealed on Sunday, which sheds new light on the ongoing medical discussions surrounding the former president.

Final Remarks on Media Ethics and Responsibilities

Amidst a swirling narrative concerning Biden’s health and political fate, the Wall Street Journal editorial board issued an editor’s note acknowledging Biden’s cancer diagnosis prior to the publication of their article. They expressed wishing him well in his recovery.

The unfolding discourse highlights the complicated relationship between media narratives, political health, and public perception. As the dynamics evolve, it remains crucial for journalists and political figures alike to maintain transparency and accountability in their dealings. While the media may shape the narrative, the responsibility of truth remains a collective endeavor that should prioritize the public’s right to know.

Fox News’ Joseph Wulfsohn contributed to this report.