Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The White House is responding to Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka, who filed a lawsuit against interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba this week. This legal action comes after Baraka’s arrest for criminal trespassing outside an ICE facility last month.
Baraka, a prominent contender for the Democratic nomination for New Jersey governor, initiated the lawsuit on Tuesday. He accuses Habba of false arrest and malicious prosecution stemming from his incident on May 9, when he protested outside a federal immigration center.
Baraka was among several public officials, including Representatives Robert Menendez, LaMonica McIver, and Bonnie Watson Coleman, who gathered outside the Delaney Hall detention center near Newark Liberty International Airport. The protest aimed to draw attention to the practices of ICE. The U.S. attorney’s office made a statement 13 days later, announcing the dismissal of the charges against Baraka for the sake of moving forward.
Filed in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey, Baraka’s civil lawsuit contends that Habba acted politically during his arrest. According to the complaint, Baraka was apprehended during the protest after allegedly trespassing and disregarding law enforcement’s instructions to disperse. Following his arrest, he spent several hours in custody before being released.
The lawsuit’s objective is to seek damages related to what Baraka’s attorneys describe as false arrest and malicious prosecution, in addition to allegedly defamatory statements made by Habba about him, including comments on social media.
In the lawsuit, Baraka’s legal team characterizes Habba as acting as a political operative rather than fulfilling her judicial responsibilities. They claim she operated in her individual personal capacity during the incident.
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, criticized Baraka’s lawsuit, labeling it as meritless and describing it as a desperate attempt to maintain relevance. She pointed out that this legal action followed Baraka’s previous controversial activities.
Jackson stated, “Much like Mr. Baraka’s last stunt – storming a federal detention facility in defense of criminal illegal aliens – this meritless lawsuit is just his latest desperate attempt to try and stay relevant among the far-left Democrat base.” Her remarks underscore the administration’s position on the encounter.
In response to the lawsuit, Habba dismissed it as shocking and not substantive. She suggested that Baraka should focus on pressing law enforcement issues instead.
In a post on X, she advised the mayor, stating, “My advice to the mayor – feel free to join me in prioritizing violent crime and public safety. Far better use of time for the great citizens of New Jersey.” Habba’s remarks reflect a call for civic responsibility amidst escalating tensions.
As of now, Baraka’s team has not responded to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit. The lack of immediate communication from his office has left some questions unanswered related to the broader implications of this legal dispute.
This lawsuit marks a significant moment in New Jersey politics, particularly as Baraka seeks to enhance his standing within the Democratic Party. As tensions continue to rise over immigration issues and law enforcement practices, this incident highlights the complexities facing public officials in the current political landscape.
The outcome of the lawsuit could have ramifications beyond just Baraka’s political career. It may affect how public officials engage with federal agencies and the degree of accountability they demand from law enforcement in similar situations involving protests.
Overall, as this situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how both parties will navigate the ongoing political landscape in New Jersey and beyond.