Wisconsin Judge Approves Conditional Release of ‘Slender Man’ Stabber Amid Ongoing Concerns

Wisconsin Judge Approves Conditional Release of ‘Slender Man’ Stabber Amid Ongoing Concerns

Morgan Geyser, the Wisconsin woman who infamously attempted to murder her classmate to appease the fictional horror character known as Slender Man, is set to be released despite lingering concerns raised by the state regarding her behavior.

A judge has determined that Geyser, now 22, is permitted to proceed with her planned conditional release from a mental health institute in Wisconsin. This decision came after the State Department of Health Services submitted a last-minute petition requesting her continued detention.

This ruling arrives following earlier unsuccessful attempts by Geyser’s defense team to secure her release. In January, Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Bohren had initially ordered her release, but officials wanted him to reconsider due to worries about Geyser’s associations and interests.

Background of the Case

In 2017, Geyser pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree intentional homicide in the stabbing of her 12-year-old classmate, Payton Leutner. During the attack, Geyser inflicted 19 stab wounds, driven by a belief that such actions would garner the favor of Slender Man. She successfully argued that she was not responsible for her actions due to a mental illness diagnosis and was subsequently found not guilty by reason of mental defect.

The severity of the crime shocked the community and raised numerous mental health questions. Geyser’s defense team and the state’s prosecuting attorney did not respond immediately to requests for comments regarding her impending release.

Expert Insights on Mental Illness and Release

Dr. Gail Saltz, a clinical associate professor of psychiatry, explained that proving mental illness as a cause of criminal behavior requires a substantial burden of evidence. She noted that it is essential to showcase an identifiable illness that incapacitates an individual’s understanding of the morality of their actions.

While individuals may have morbid interests, understanding whether such interests are indicative of dangerous behavior remains complex. “Many people engage with violent material in a non-threatening way,” Saltz said, emphasizing this nuance.

Controversy Surrounding Geyser’s Release

Geyser’s relationship with a man who collects memorabilia associated with murder has raised significant red flags. Prosecutors expressed concern that she had not fully disclosed her reading habits, including a violent book she was allegedly reading.

In court, Geyser’s defense attorney, Tony Cotton, countered claims from state officials. He asserted that the staff at Winnebago Mental Health Institute were aware of the memorabilia collector’s visits. Cotton also stated that Geyser had adhered to her care team’s guidelines regarding her reading choices.

Cotton maintained that Geyser does not pose a greater danger to society today than she did previously, reflecting a shift from her early teenage years.

Psychological Evaluation and Community Concerns

Judge Bohren heard from multiple psychologists who recommended Geyser’s release during a prior hearing. Although her fascination with dark topics flags concerns, experts argue that many individuals engage with such interests without escalating into harmful behaviors.

Specific titles, such as the book “Rent Boy,” which touches on murder themes and illicit organ sales, prompted agency officials to voice their worries. They noted that Geyser’s disclosure regarding her choice of reading material occurred only when she was confronted by her care team.

Waukesha County Deputy District Attorney Abbey Nickolie articulated this concern, emphasizing that these red flags were significant factors in determining Geyser’s risk to the community.

Impact and Aftermath

While the psychological ramifications of violence can be profound, experts are divided on how someone with Geyser’s history interacts with violent narratives. Saltz expressed that it is critical to consider the line between thought and behavior, recognizing the potential influence on individuals with a violent background.

As Bohren concluded that Geyser does not currently pose a threat to public safety, her next court appearance is scheduled for April 28. Officials continue to monitor her progress and behavior as she integrates back into society.

The complexity of this case highlights the challenges facing the legal and mental health systems. Geyser’s actions, rooted in a troubling past, raise critical questions regarding rehabilitation, responsibility, and societal safety.

Reflection and Ongoing Dialogue

These circumstances prompt a broader discussion about handling juvenile offenders in similar situations. The focus on the victim, Payton Leutner, also remains vital, as the repercussions of the attack were deeply traumatic. Dr. Saltz pointed out the rarity of locking a minor away for life, stressing the need for evaluations of rehabilitation potential.

As conversations around mental health and criminal justice continue to evolve, cases like Geyser’s underscore the necessity for nuanced understanding. The criminal justice system must finely balance the rights of individuals against the safety needs of society.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.