Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Eight female collegiate athletes from soccer, volleyball, and track and field have formally appealed a recent settlement involving the NCAA. This settlement, known as House v. NCAA, has raised significant concerns about fairness and equity in college sports.
Approved by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken, the settlement allows universities to directly compensate athletes. However, the appeal argues that the terms of the deal will leave female athletes without their rightful share of compensation.
These athletes contend that they will not receive an equitable portion of the estimated $2.7 billion in back pay designated for those who were previously prohibited from monetizing their name, image, and likeness (NIL). This ongoing struggle encapsulates broader issues of gender equality within collegiate athletics.
Leading the appeal are Kacie Breeding from Vanderbilt and seven representatives from the College of Charleston, including Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Haas, Savannah Baron, and Elizabeth Arnold, along with Kate Johnson from Virginia. This group had previously voiced objections to the proposed settlement due to perceived inequities.
Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing these student-athletes, expressed their firm belief that the settlement violates Title IX, the federal statute designed to eliminate sex-based discrimination in educational institutions. According to Hare, the discrepancies in the settlement could deprive female athletes of a staggering $1.1 billion.
“We support a settlement, but it must be a fair one that aligns with federal law,” Hare remarked. “The current calculation overlooks Title IX, creating a scenario that could inflict lasting damage on women’s sports.”
Under the current terms, payouts favor football and basketball players at major universities, who may stand to gain significant annual shares from the $20.5 million designated to be distributed to athletes in the coming year. Conversely, athletes in less lucrative sports could find their scholarships diminished or face cuts to their roster positions.
Further emphasizing the inequity, Hare added, “This settlement primarily benefits revenue-generating sports like football and basketball without adequately considering the needs of female athletes. Congress has explicitly denied the push to exempt these sports from Title IX’s discrimination standards. Even the NCAA had previously concurred with this viewpoint. Our appeal reiterates their own arguments prior to the settlement.”
The appeal, lodged by the Boulder, Colorado-based law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook, will proceed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. This case has garnered attention, highlighting the ongoing fight for equality in sports and education.
In light of the deliberations surrounding this case, it is crucial to recognize the implications it carries for future legal standards in collegiate sports. The outcome of this appeal may set a significant precedent that influences how colleges navigate compensation and equity among student-athletes, particularly those in women’s sports.
As this case progresses, the voices of female athletes will undoubtedly continue to resonate throughout the legal discussions. Their experiences and concerns are representative of a larger movement demanding equal treatment and fair financial opportunities for all athletes, regardless of gender.
As the nation watches, this appeal addresses fundamental questions regarding equity within educational and athletic frameworks. The athletes involved hope to not only receive fair compensation but also to inspire systemic changes that reverberate throughout collegiate athletics.
By highlighting these issues, they draw attention to the need for fairness that extends beyond the courtroom and reverberates on athletic fields across the country.
